In reply to:
Gianni POV
@giannipov
·
430d
The statement engages in a public discourse by addressing the conduct of political figures, specifically comparing Biden and Trump, and responding to a broader conversation about political accountability and perceived biases.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('bs') which could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the other person's perspective strongly.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the perceived difference in misconduct levels between Biden and Trump. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue with someone in disagreement but uses a confrontational tone ('bs'), which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.