The statement expresses a strong opinion on a judicial ruling, suggesting that the judge's decision is inappropriate and undermines shareholder rights. It reflects a critical stance on the role of judges in corporate governance, which is a public issue.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a dismissive tone ('disgrace') and labels judges as 'activist,' which could be seen as a personal attack rather than a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but it lacks responsible use of the platform as it does not provide a reasoned argument or evidence to support the claim. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.