Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement reports on a protest by Canadian Jews against the war on Gaza, calling for Canada to stop arming Israel and implement an arms embargo. It addresses a significant public issue related to international relations and military policies, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to use harmful language or incite violence, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- There is no evidence of disrespecting privacy or engaging in hate speech; it focuses on a political stance. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a protest and the reasons behind it, fostering empathy for the cause. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather presents a political argument, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on a protest and its objectives. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.