Matt Taibbi

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -74
12/6/2024, 1:42:03 AM
X
In reply to:
Rodney Campbell
@rodneycampbell
·
240d
@mtaibbi Threatening to fund a political opponent isn’t a threat? Did you read that comment before posting it?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
240d
Pretty sure threatening to fund a political opponent is not a “threat,” or incitement, or even new — I remember Republicans doing this to members who waffled on the CAFTA vote ages ago
Billy Holcomb
@themaddog247
·
240d
@guelphgirlchris This guy is going to be a part of the incoming administration, and he’s threatening members of congress… cool. Free speech, right @mtaibbi ?

The statement engages in a discussion about the nature of political threats and free speech, particularly in the context of funding political opponents. It questions whether such actions constitute a threat or prohibited speech, contributing to a broader debate on political influence and free speech.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is part of a broader discussion on political tactics. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the concept of political threats rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the interpretation of 'threat' in a political context. [+1]