The statement critiques the media's handling of anonymous sources during the Trump era, suggesting that reliance on such sources led to a loss of credibility and audience. It implies a need for more rigorous journalistic standards.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived issues in journalism, which could be seen as an attempt to improve media practices, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not naming specific journalists or sources, but it broadly criticizes media practices. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of journalistic practices, though it could be seen as a generalization. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.