The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence and the opposition from national security officials. It calls for public action by encouraging people to sign a petition, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to polarization by framing the opposition as something to be objected to without addressing the underlying concerns. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the privacy and dignity of the national security officials by dismissing their concerns without discussion. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, as it dismisses the objections of the national security officials without addressing their concerns. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize public action, but it does so in a way that may not contribute to the betterment of society by encouraging divisiveness. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by encouraging public participation through a petition, but it could use the platform more responsibly by fostering a more balanced discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.