Wulf, Wulf aka BeaverHound
@GripsBright
·
427d
The statement is a response to a tweet that minimizes the significance of an event involving Jewish children. The responder uses strong language to challenge the original poster to take responsibility for their words, indicating a desire for accountability.
- The statement uses aggressive language, which can be considered harmful and does not strive to do no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement challenges the original poster to own their words, which could be seen as an attempt at constructive criticism, but the use of profanity detracts from a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.