Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by H. R. McMaster addresses public issues related to international relations, security, and terrorism, thus constituting public discourse. It suggests actions regarding hostages and Iran's influence in the region, reflecting a stance on foreign policy.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but suggests punitive actions against Iran, which could be interpreted as advocating for aggressive measures. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does target a specific nation, which could be seen as lacking respect for its dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on punitive measures rather than diplomatic solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a specific foreign policy stance, which may or may not be seen as betterment depending on one's perspective on international relations.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.