The statement involves a public official discussing a matter of public concern, specifically the presence of sophisticated drones over New Jersey. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses public safety and security issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a factual report on a security issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does inform the public about a potential security issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it is a straightforward report. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public about a security concern, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly informing the public about a security issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.