Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a controversial incident involving Daniel Penny and Jordan Neely, touching on themes of race, safety, and public perception. The tone suggests a personal perspective on the incident, expressing gratitude for perceived protection while implicitly acknowledging racial dynamics.
- The statement may inadvertently cause harm by appearing to justify or support actions that led to a controversial outcome, potentially minimizing the harm experienced by others. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but may not fully respect the dignity of those involved by framing the incident in a way that could be seen as dismissive of the broader social implications. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards all parties involved, focusing instead on a personal perspective that may lack compassion for differing views. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the complexity of the situation or the perspectives of those who disagree. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.