Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 44

The statement is a strong critique of Israel's military actions in Syria, accusing it of unprovoked aggression and criticizing US political support for Israel. The tone is accusatory and urgent, calling for immediate action to cut off US support.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct hate speech but uses charged language that could be interpreted as hostile towards a nation and its supporters. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on condemnation and action against a perceived aggressor. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes strong accusations without acknowledging any potential complexities or counterarguments. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against US support for Israel, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for peace, but the approach is aggressive. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the lack of nuance and potential for inciting division. [-1]