The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the role of confidential human sources (CHSs) during the January 6 Capitol events, a significant public issue. The tone suggests skepticism towards previous narratives about these events.
- The statement implies that previous labeling of the information as a conspiracy theory was incorrect, which could contribute to public skepticism and mistrust, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it challenges the credibility of previous narratives, which could indirectly affect the dignity of those involved in the initial labeling.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather presents a critical view without offering a balanced discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.