Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses support for specific presidential candidates based on their stance on nationalized single-payer healthcare, while criticizing other candidates for supporting the privatized insurance system. It engages in public discourse by addressing a significant public policy issue: healthcare.
- The statement uses strong language to criticize the privatized insurance system, which could be seen as harmful to those who support it, but it does not directly attack individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the candidates' positions on healthcare, but it lacks empathy and compassion towards those with differing views.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes Harris and Trump but does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide evidence for its claims, bordering on personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by expressing a political opinion, but it could use more responsible language to foster constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.