Philadelphia Housing Action
@PhlHousing
·
322d
The statement criticizes the decision to commute the sentence of a judge involved in a scandal while highlighting the lack of pardons for other controversial figures. It engages with public issues related to justice and fairness in the legal system.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of a public decision.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but criticizes public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather presents a critical viewpoint. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived injustices in the legal system. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique a public decision responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.