Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses the nature of drone sightings in New Jersey and Connecticut, attributing them to federal government operations. This touches on public concerns about privacy, government transparency, and security, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could incite public concern or fear about government surveillance, which may indirectly cause distress. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing sensitive information about individuals but raises concerns about government operations that might infringe on public privacy.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents information without context or explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue or criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to inform the public about government operations, but the lack of context or detail may not fully uphold responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.