Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 38

The statement is a critical commentary on U.S. government spending priorities, particularly regarding military expenditure and its implications for global conflicts and domestic welfare. It calls for political action by urging voters to remove certain lawmakers from office, thus engaging in public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions or fear, thus partially violating this principle. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as disrespectful to certain individuals or groups, partially violating this principle. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for those affected by military actions and budget allocations, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes lawmakers but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to this principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal change by encouraging political action, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique government policies and uses its platform to influence public opinion, aligning with this principle. [+1]