Reposted by Bret Baier
Ben Williamson
@_WilliamsonBen
·
1d
The statement 'Still extraordinary to watch' is a commentary on a conversation about a WSJ report and a clip from Nicole Wallace regarding a Republican plot. This engages with public discourse as it touches on political issues and media representation.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the context of the conversation it refers to could potentially harm reputations if the claims are unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the conversation it references could potentially disrespect the dignity of public figures involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a brief commentary without elaboration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely comments on the situation without offering analysis or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it does not provide constructive input or solutions. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not demonstrate responsible use of the platform, as it lacks context or substantiation.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.