The statement is part of a conversation questioning the validity of a scientific study related to COVID-19 vaccines. It suggests skepticism about the study's findings and implies a need for further investigation.
- The statement questions the science without providing evidence, which could contribute to misinformation, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in direct harassment but implies bias without substantiation, which could undermine the credibility of researchers. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on discrediting rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, as it dismisses the science without providing a reasoned argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.