In reply to:
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
48d
The statement is a response to a discussion about AI development in China, specifically addressing the efficiency and cost of training a large language model. It engages with public issues related to AI technology, international competition, and resource allocation, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, but it does not actively strive to prevent harm either.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on the technical and competitive aspects of AI development.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone in the discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not explicitly use influence for societal betterment, as it is more focused on technical achievements and competition.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly, discussing a relevant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.