A Republic, if you can keep it
@GlennMorin10
·
1d
The statement engages in a public discourse about media censorship and the role of social media platforms in controlling information, particularly in the context of an election. It challenges the narrative around the censorship of a news story and questions the integrity of the platforms involved.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could contribute to a polarized discourse by asserting censorship without providing evidence.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the actions of social media platforms, which could be seen as a critique rather than a violation of privacy or dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on asserting a viewpoint rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of social media platforms and intelligence leaders but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by questioning the actions of powerful entities, which is a responsible use of the platform, though it could be more balanced. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.