Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
12/26/2024, 11:25:29 PM
X
In reply to:
ʟɪʟ ʙᴜʀᴛ 🎱
@Lilburt8
·
189d
@mtaibbi This event has given you PTSD. You peed yourself about gov't partnering with soc media to supposedly suppress speech, but you are less bothered by your ex-bf, the owner of this site, doing in plain sight what alleged others were doing in private. It's so pathetic.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
189d
Did the Russians force Hunter Biden to fill his computer with porn and incriminating emails? What part of that story is supposed to be “Russian”?
BuddyB
@mtsand3
·
189d
@mtaibbi Have you watched from Russia to Lev? You don't think the whole thing was a set up to help trump win against Biden? Is it fun being a right wing propagandist? Stories you don't tell about the incoming oligarchy and Musk essentially getting trunp elected are necessary & newsworthy

The statement is part of a broader conversation about government involvement in social media and censorship, which are public issues. The tone is defensive and aims to clarify the speaker's position on the seriousness of government actions compared to private actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is part of a heated exchange that could contribute to a divisive atmosphere.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in hate speech, but it is part of a conversation that includes personal attacks. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the speaker's stance on government involvement. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but is part of a thread that includes personal attacks, which detracts from constructive criticism. [-1]