Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to be a report or commentary on a public issue involving international relations between the U.S. and Canada, specifically regarding comments made by a public figure, Donald Trump. It touches on the potential political implications of these comments, which could be considered a matter of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the content it reports on could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it reports on public figures and their statements.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it primarily reports on a provocative comment.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it is a report on a public figure's comments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a political issue, which could contribute to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public figure's comments, using its platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.