In reply to:
Bernie fan
@replyguy123
·
187d
Eddie Gimes
@Tampahightides
·
187d
Bernie fan
@replyguy123
·
187d
The statement questions the FBI's knowledge and reporting of a significant event related to the Trump Tower meeting in 2016, suggesting a lack of transparency or omission in official documents. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of governmental transparency and accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies potential misconduct, which could indirectly harm reputations if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by questioning the completeness of official reports, though it could be more constructive.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of a government agency without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.