Pasta Fazool John
@JohnTGrod
·
186d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of discrimination in mortgage lending, a significant societal concern. The tone is dismissive towards the idea that redlining is still a legal issue, suggesting a misunderstanding or disagreement with the current state of discrimination in lending practices.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but the dismissive tone towards ongoing discrimination issues could indirectly contribute to harm by downplaying the experiences of those affected. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it lacks respect for the dignity of those who may still face discrimination. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the concerns about ongoing discrimination in lending. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead dismisses the opposing viewpoint without providing evidence or engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.