Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement raises questions about the credibility of a reported incident involving a 'Trump Cybertruck Bomber' in Las Vegas. It implies skepticism about the official narrative by questioning how identification documents survived an explosion that left a body unrecognizable. The statement engages with public issues related to law enforcement, media reporting, and public trust, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to public skepticism or distrust in official narratives, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the credibility of a public report.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on skepticism and questioning. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by questioning an official narrative, but it should ensure that such skepticism is based on factual evidence to maintain integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.