The statement references a question posed to a public official about a significant public issue—white supremacy as a terrorist threat. This engages with public discourse as it touches on societal concerns and government policy.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the press secretary's response, which is a common aspect of political discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a straightforward report of an interaction.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a perceived evasion of a question.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement implies criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It reports on a public interaction without derogatory language.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public issue and uses the platform to highlight a question of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.