Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 14

The statement is a call to action regarding the alleged treatment of Dr. Abu Safiya by Israel, urging people to contact U.S. officials to demand his release. It addresses a serious public issue related to human rights and international relations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses Israel of torture, which could be considered as not respecting the dignity of others, potentially leading to hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language without providing context or evidence. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a direct accusation without room for discussion. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to mobilize action, but it does so in a way that could be seen as divisive rather than unifying. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it makes serious allegations without substantiation. [-1]