Reposted by Bret Baier
Armando Salguero
@ArmandoSalguero
·
185d
The statement engages in public discourse as it comments on media coverage of a significant public issue, namely terrorism, and implies a critique of ESPN's approach to such events.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but its accusatory tone could contribute to divisiveness. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does imply criticism of ESPN without specific evidence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a confrontational tone towards ESPN. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.