Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by President Trump addresses public issues such as legislative processes and border security, indicating it is part of public discourse. The tone is assertive and focused on policy goals, with a mention of respect for a political figure.
- The statement does not contain harmful language, but the assertive tone on border security could be seen as divisive depending on the audience's perspective. It neither strongly adheres to nor violates the principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on policy goals without addressing the human impact of those policies. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, and it mentions respect for another political figure, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for policy goals, which can be seen as an attempt to contribute to societal betterment from the speaker's perspective. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to communicate policy intentions, aligning with responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.