The statement engages in a public discourse about media integrity and disinformation, particularly in the context of reporting on significant issues like Russiagate. The tone is defensive and challenges accusations of spreading disinformation.
- The statement does not directly harm but could contribute to polarization by dismissing opposing views without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but engages in a public dispute that could be seen as dismissive of others' perspectives.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a defensive tone, which may hinder understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.