The statement is part of a public discourse on media accuracy and disinformation, particularly regarding the Trump-Russia story. It challenges the credibility of legacy media and defends the reporting of certain journalists.
- The statement does not directly harm but questions the accuracy of media reporting, which can be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views, potentially bordering on disrespect. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in dialogue but does so in a confrontational manner, which may not foster constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to challenge mainstream narratives, which can be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.