Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to the actions of a public official, specifically the decision to cut fire department funding and travel during a crisis.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the mayor's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public actions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or avoid ad hominem arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a public issue, potentially for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to question public actions responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.