Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement comments on a news clip involving a conversation between a reporter and a public official, suggesting that the clip could be used in attack ads. This implies a critique of the official's response to a public issue, specifically a water shortage, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of a public official's response, which is a common aspect of political discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on the public official's response to a public issue.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement implies criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the official's handling of a public issue, which is a legitimate aspect of public discourse.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.