Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -18
1/9/2025, 6:05:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
254d
You don’t understand the word “evidence.”

When Henry says, “We do not have concrete evidence data was exfiltrated from the DNC,” that means he can’t say absolutely that it happened.

Everything else is subjective analysis and inference.
Scary Shiva Jaamen
@Jaamennn
·
254d
@anniefofani @mtaibbi @aaronjmate @ggreenwald @paulsperry_ @LeeSmithDC 1. Because they have evidence it was hacked and set up for exfiltration
2. That means Taibbi's saying the guy testified that there was no evidence of hacking is a lie. A LIE

The statement is part of a broader discussion about evidence related to data exfiltration from the DNC, touching on issues of cybersecurity and attribution. The conversation involves interpreting testimony and the nature of evidence, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a heated debate that could lead to misunderstandings if not carefully considered.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is part of a contentious exchange that may polarize opinions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critical discussion but does not resort to personal attacks, focusing instead on the interpretation of evidence. [+1]