The statement criticizes fact-checking practices, suggesting they focus on narratives rather than facts, and calls for journalists to denounce these practices. It implies a failure in journalistic integrity and accountability.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to expose perceived harm in fact-checking practices, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for journalistic integrity.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement could be seen as disrespectful to fact-checkers, potentially violating the principle of respecting others' dignity.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in strong criticism of journalists who do not denounce certain fact-checkers, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism.
[-1]