Bret Baier

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 76

The statement discusses a significant public issue involving the potential ban of TikTok in the U.S. due to national security concerns. It references the Supreme Court's role and the Biden administration's stance, indicating engagement in public discourse about free speech and national security.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses a contentious issue that could have significant implications.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on legal and policy aspects rather than personal attacks.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does inform the public about a critical issue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement presents the issue without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing on the legal and policy debate. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing a major public issue, the statement uses its influence to inform the public, contributing to societal awareness. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing the implications of a potential TikTok ban, a matter of public concern. [+1]