Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a significant public issue involving the potential ban of TikTok in the U.S. due to national security concerns. It references the Supreme Court's role and the Biden administration's stance, indicating engagement in public discourse about free speech and national security.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses a contentious issue that could have significant implications.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on legal and policy aspects rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does inform the public about a critical issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement presents the issue without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing on the legal and policy debate. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing a major public issue, the statement uses its influence to inform the public, contributing to societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing the implications of a potential TikTok ban, a matter of public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.