Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47

Score -16

-1

And you’re somehow implying that by saying I never saw DMs and had to sign an FTC waiver promising not to view any, that this must mean there were juicy DMs.

1/11/2025, 1:04:07 AM

In reply to:

Matt Taibbi

@mtaibbi

254d

You’re completely nuts - I’m not “admitting” the Twitter Files were a “limited hangout” (which you should take out of quotes, because I didn’t say that) because of the obvious fact that we didn’t get every conceivable communication between Twitter and the government. I

Ayesha de Queiroz

@ayeshadequeiroz

255d

@flagellan @FringeViews I've been harassing him about the targeted censorship of TERFs, the moment he was announced as a publisher of Twitter Files. After 3 years he finally admits that they were a limited hangout is meaningless, because he knew before he got the files. @mtaibbi
https://nationalfile.com/matt-ta…

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate about the transparency and integrity of the Twitter Files, which are relevant to public interest and media ethics. The tone is defensive and addresses accusations of withholding information.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but is defensive in nature, which may not promote a positive discourse.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it is part of a heated exchange that includes accusations and strong language.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is defensive and dismissive of the accusations without addressing them substantively. [-1]