Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -16
1/11/2025, 3:22:20 AM
X
In reply to:
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
255d
@mtaibbi @mtaibbi looking back on the information revealed in the Twitter Files, did it have more bearing on the outcome of the election, than the issues that TERFs have been lobbying and speaking out against since the Obama administration? The issue that was hijacked by the GOP.
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
255d
@mtaibbi @Mathew2338 @RobertPandev Paul Singer has been funding transgender legislation for decades. He was a major Twitter shareholder; he installed your fall guys. He also hijacked our movement to do damage control on his behalf. That could only happen if the crimes against were erased.
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
345d
From the Obama administration onward, TERFs were censored on all social media. Even during the Trump era. Seemingly it became worse when Biden was elected, and we were later given explanations through Twitter Files. But another aspect wasn't told.
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
255d
@mtaibbi @Mathew2338 @RobertPandev I've made threads to try and explain this. We were hijacked by the billionaire interests doing damage control, to protect their reputations, like Peter Thiel and Paul Singer. MS worked for The Pritzkers.
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
360d
Genspect exists to protect the interests of the billionaire class invested in The Trans Industrial Complex, & redeem those invested in the transgender market by using the exact same techniques of WPATH, while supporting AGP sex offenders & pedo apologists
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
255d
@mtaibbi @Mathew2338 @RobertPandev This targeted censorship based on our sex, happened while we were lobbying politicians, journalists, NGOs, nonprofits to see, cover and understand that our rights were being erased in International, Federal, State laws. Do you not see the civil rights crime here?
Ayesha de Queiroz
@ayeshadequeiroz
·
255d
@mtaibbi @Mathew2338 @RobertPandev Please let me break this down for you. I tried desperately for you to see me on Substack before you were ever given files. Since The Obama administration, during Trump and Biden, Women were specifically targeted for censorship based on immutable characteristics, our sex. -
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
255d
@Mathew2338 @ayeshadequeiroz @RobertPandev That I didn’t cover censorship of TERFs in the Twitter Files wasn’t because I was covering it up but because I had a limited number of searches. This is the same as people upset I didn’t look at censorship of Bernie in 2020. We only had a few searches! Jesus

The statement and its context involve a discussion on the influence of billionaire interests on social media censorship and its potential impact on elections and public discourse. The conversation touches on issues of censorship, political influence, and civil rights, which are relevant to public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but is part of a broader conversation that could potentially spread misinformation or unfounded claims, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation involves accusations against specific individuals and organizations, which could be seen as disrespectful or damaging to their reputations without clear evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations and conspiracy theories. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue lacks constructive criticism and instead engages in personal attacks and unverified claims. [-1]