In reply to:
Gudrun Hreinsson
@GudrunHreinsson
·
255d
The statement is part of a public discourse involving a critique of media reporting and political figures. The tone is confrontational, with an accusation of spreading lies. The reply questions the basis of the accusation, seeking clarification.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it involves an accusation of lying without evidence, which can be harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves name-calling and a personal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses an accusatory tone rather than fostering understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.