The statement engages in a discussion about the complexity and challenges of addressing platform censorship, involving multiple NGOs and government stakeholders. It reflects on the difficulty of mapping the entire system due to its complexity and the involvement of various actors and laws.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the complexity of the issue, which can foster empathy and compassion for those navigating it. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by building on the previous comments without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the intricacies of platform censorship, the statement uses its influence to highlight a societal issue, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public issue without spreading misinformation or engaging in harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.