The statement engages in a public discourse about the nature of censorship versus moderation, a topic relevant to societal issues concerning free speech and content regulation. The tone is assertive, aiming to clarify a perceived misconception about the terms used in content regulation.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it could be seen as dismissive of the nuances in content moderation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for others' dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on asserting a viewpoint rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not encourage constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing censorship and moderation, using the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.