The statement questions the visibility and presence of federal leadership in response to an emergency in California, implying a lack of direct engagement by President Biden and Vice President Harris. It critiques the federal response by comparing it to past administrations, suggesting a perceived inadequacy.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm with words but implies criticism of federal leadership.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical in nature.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to question and potentially hold leaders accountable, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise questions about public leadership.
[+1]