Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD
@houmanhemmati
·
22d
The statement and related conversation involve a political debate about the conditions attached to disaster aid in California. The tone is accusatory and critical, with claims of political maneuvering and virtue signaling. The statement denies conditioning aid on other priorities, countering accusations from political opponents.
- The statement attempts to clarify a position, which can help reduce harm by addressing misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation includes strong language and accusations, which may not fully respect the dignity of others involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The dialogue is critical and involves personal attacks, which detracts from constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.