The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of cancel culture and the use of offensive language. It suggests that people should not be canceled for using certain slurs, implying a need for a middle ground in societal reactions to offensive speech.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it downplays the impact of using offensive language, which can be harmful to marginalized groups. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others, as it defends the use of derogatory terms that can be considered hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses concerns about offensive language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses dismissive language ('stupid') and does not acknowledge the reasons behind opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.