In reply to:
Skeptic
@Skeptic77207158
·
198d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
198d
Zooey Orcinus Orca 🦨🏝️🗿
@zooeyd1
·
198d
The statement engages in a discussion about the impact of public backlash on a columnist's income, touching on issues of free speech and cancel culture. It questions the financial consequences faced by the columnist and suggests a distinction between different types of subscribers.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses the harm experienced by the columnist.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but indirectly engages in a broader conversation about public figures and their reputations.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the business aspect. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It contributes to a discussion on societal issues like cancel culture and free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.