The statement engages in a public discourse about the impact of cancel culture on academics, questioning the dismissal of concerns about job losses due to allegations. It challenges the notion that cancel culture is inconsequential, suggesting that the repercussions are significant and warrant attention.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of those who have lost jobs, potentially lacking empathy. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as dismissive of the experiences of those affected.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the concerns of those who have lost jobs. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue by questioning another's perspective, but it could be more constructive by avoiding dismissive language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.