Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to the Department of Justice and a confirmation hearing, which are matters of public concern.
- The statement uses strong language ('excoriated', 'ROT', 'CATASTROPHIC') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong language and does not provide a platform for discussion or rebuttal. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform responsibly due to the inflammatory language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.