Bret Baier

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 45

The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a political issue involving credit for a diplomatic achievement, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, suggesting a discrepancy between Biden's and the State Department's statements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words, but the sarcastic tone could contribute to divisiveness. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political point-scoring. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm rather than reasoned argument. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on pointing out a perceived inconsistency.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it is more focused on political criticism. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform to foster integrity or responsibility.