AG Ashley Moody
@AGAshleyMoody
·
6d
The statement by AG Ashley Moody constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of judicial appointments and the values that should guide the confirmation of judges and justices. It reflects on the judicial philosophy of Justices Alito and Thomas, suggesting they embody the values of the Founding Fathers, and indicates a commitment to ensuring future judges share similar values.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing depending on one's view of Justices Alito and Thomas.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it primarily focuses on a specific judicial philosophy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a particular judicial philosophy, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment from the speaker's perspective. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly express a viewpoint on judicial appointments. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.