Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the Supreme Court's ruling on TikTok, which has implications for privacy, data collection, and free speech. The tone is informative and critical, aiming to highlight the implications of the court's decision and TikTok's data practices.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critical tone towards TikTok's data practices could be seen as harsh.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement critiques TikTok's data practices but does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue and uses the platform to inform others about the court ruling. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.